On (Not) Writing, Part I
October 5th, 2008 at 3:29 PMOne Chanter meeting, Darren, poet and self-described “internet fiend”, told me he knew about this blog. “You never update it,” he said. “Why?”
It’s a good question. Though I’ve been parked at this web space since 2004, I have never regularly updated this site. There were times when I updated often, of course, but consistency, in the broad sense, has never been a virtue of citizenb. And I have, without a doubt, lost readers for this reason, as well as a valuable opportunity to practice writing and get my thoughts out there. I even go so far as to promise more and more-consistent updates (case-in-point: the as-of-yet unwritten post on the RNC) and fail to deliver.
So, where’s my sense of commitment? Why don’tI update this thing? “I’m lazy,” I said to Darren. Even if that is true, it is too easy an answer. When it really comes down to it, I don’t know.
But it’s something I’ve been thinking about, even before Darren pointed out my lack of commitment. On a hike along the shore of Lake Superior this summer, Jaynin asked me why I write. Responding, I sounded like a politician: my answers were anything but straight. I always talked about being a writer in some future capacity, she said, blabbering on about how I could become one, as if it were some benchmark I had to fly by or some position I could get promoted to. Didn’t you become a writer by writing? Or maybe not even–all you had to do was identify, to represent. No one needed to give you permission. It came from within, not from without.
One of the most thought-provoking pieces of advice someone gave me when I was leaving high school was this: no one ever grows up. You’ll still always been who you always have been–mercurial, constant, good, bad, fast or slow. You do not reach some magical plateau where things are figured out, people behave, and life is more discrete. While some people may embody ‘grown-up-ness’, the process of becoming and being grown-up is something based on coercion and consent, an embrace of older age and identity or a tacit, unsaid acceptance.
In the same way, I am thinking now, you do not become a writer: you are or are not. It is a state of mind achieved through a sometimes subconscious handshake of interior thought and social life. And I am realizing more and more that I am not a writer. I talk about becoming a writer because I understand something intuitively: I cannot identify as a writer because I lack the confidence to do so. I lack the confidence because I do not write and I do not write because I am afraid: afraid I do not know what to write about, afraid that others will not like it, afraid I will waste my time, afraid, most of all, that I am not good enough.
This is how far the rabbit-hole goes. I realize now, to appropriate Pogo, that I have met my enemy and he is me. I write for other people. I write because that’s what I have been told I should do. I have to find my own voice. I have to write for me.
